An easy glance at my record on this web site will attest to the reality that I’m a big follower of relationship scientific studies. I am mesmerized by the ways we try to use technology to gender and really love, in hopes of one day to be able to explain the mysterious means of one’s heart.
Some scientific studies offer fascinating understanding of modern mating rituals, but many (or even many) tend to be, as TruTv.com writer Nick Nadel puts it, “best sites for cougarsehead-slappingly clear.” Nadel built-up a summary of 10 studies that a lot of positively fall under aforementioned classification. Here are some for the highlights:
Questionable learn no. 1: experts at Radboud University of Nijmegen into the Netherlands found that males generally have problem executing cognitive activities after socializing with people in the alternative sex. In other words, Nadel claims, “interacting with women helps make guys stupid.”
Nadel’s Take: “As clear studies get, this is actually up indeed there with ‘people often fold the truth online.'” It mustn’t just take a study group to find out that men’s brains have distracted around women.
My personal views: i need to side with Nadel about this one. It shouldn’t arrive as a surprise that men’s room minds have somewhat addled around attractive ladies, and I also bet that a research on ladies’ minds would realize that they truly are equally as addled around appealing men.
Questionable Study # 2: based on the findings of a single of OkCupid’s many reports throughout the OkTrends web log, individuals who utilize Twitter everyday have smaller interactions than others that do not.
Nadel’s Take: OkCupid doesn’t even believe their own findings. a spokesperson for any website mentioned “Unfortunately, there is not a chance to share with who’s dumping who here; if the Twitterati are more frustrating or simply just a lot more flighty than everybody else.” This basically means, there is no actual proof that Twitter has almost anything to perform with the length of a relationship.
My personal mind: In the event the folks accountable for the study aren’t also yes exactly what their particular findings are, they may be most likely not really worth spending a lot attention to. The OkTrends researches are a lot of fun, but they are certainly not the definitive phrase on all things online dating.
Questionable learn # 3: the duration of men’s ring finger relates to their attractiveness, per a group during the University of Geneva in Switzerland. The proportion that compares the length of a man’s list fist to his ring finger is recognized as “2D:4D.”
Nadel’s simply take: The study states that men with extended band hands have “rugged, caveman-like” faces. “Right,” Nadel states, “because women constantly go for the caveman look. It is not like some of our very own top male stars tend to be non-threatening, baby-faced types or something.”
My ideas: many respected reports examining feminine perception of male attractiveness discovered that women tend to be attracted to distinct guys during various phases of these monthly period rounds. A female could, for that reason, want to consider the “baby-faced kinds” together with “rugged cavemen” throughout four weeks. And also as far since hands go, “relationship is certainly not causation” – though there is a match up between little finger duration and attractiveness, one does not necessarily cause the different.
Stay tuned in to get more frivolous results and silly studies from Nick Nadel and TruTV…
